A pet supplies shop or a homeware store in a residential neighbourhood rarely asks where the price came from when it buys from a local wholesaler. Then one day it sees a factory quote for the same product online, and the gap is hard to accept. But the difference is not swallowed by one person: it is spread across four or five hands, and each of those hands is doing something specific for the store.
How many hands does a product pass through from factory to shelf
| Layer | What it does | Typical markup range (market practice) | Can a small retailer replace it? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Factory | Produces to order and ships | - (cost baseline) | Yes, but you take on everything downstream |
| Exporter / trading company | Takes the order, handles customs, books space, collects and pays foreign currency | 5%-15% of ex-works price | A single store's volume usually cannot support it |
| Importer | Funds the goods, clears customs, pays duty, bears compliance responsibility | 15%-30% of landed cost | Yes, but needs cash flow and compliance capability |
| Regional wholesaler | Holds stock, breaks bulk, delivers next day, handles returns | A further 20%-40% | Very hard - what this layer sells is stock and speed |
| Store | Displays, sells, provides after-sales | Retail markup | - |
The ranges in the table are general industry approximations; actual figures vary widely with category, volume and turnover speed. For bulky, low-priced, slow-moving categories the middle layers usually take a higher percentage, because they tie up more warehousing and capital. None of this is an argument for the store to haggle layer by layer; it is about recognising one fact first: every price difference corresponds to a service, and cutting the price means cutting the service.
The three most overlooked questions: who does the work after direct sourcing
The first is funding and inventory. The value of a wholesaler is that when you need two cases next week, he can deliver tomorrow. Direct sourcing means the money goes out a month or even three months earlier while the goods are still at sea, with your cash flow locked inside a container. The second is compliance responsibility. Once goods are imported in your name, you are the importer on the label, and you are also the party a product problem comes back to - a point small retailers frequently ignore altogether.
The third is breaking bulk and after-sales. Factories ship by full carton and full pallet; stores sell by the piece. The breaking of bulk, sorting, replacement of damaged items and customer returns in between look like small chores but consume a great deal of labour. None of that work disappears after direct sourcing; it simply moves onto your own desk.
What kind of direct sourcing structure is actually worthwhile
In practice the answer is neither sourcing everything directly nor relying entirely on wholesalers, but tiering by SKU. Categories with fast turnover, small volume, a high degree of standardisation and full-carton ordering suit direct sourcing; categories that are highly seasonal, change style quickly and have uncertain sales per store are more economical left with the wholesaler. The basis for differentiating is not how big the price gap is, but how much annual volume that category can lock in.
Case: tiered direct sourcing at a twelve-store pet chain
A regional European pet chain with twelve stores used to buy everything from local wholesalers. After ESTROUTE helped it work through almost two years of sales data, the SKUs were split into three groups: litter boxes and fountain accessories, which accounted for sixty percent of volume and had stable styles, went to direct sourcing; seasonal toys and festive decorations stayed with wholesalers; high-ticket smart products started with small trial orders. The first phase touched only nine SKUs across two groups, and took seventy-four days from inquiry and sampling through inspection to arrival.
The result was a clear fall in unit purchase cost, but because the chain now carried inspection, container consolidation and compliance documents itself, the improvement in book net profit was smaller than the drop in unit price. The real gain was structural: for the first time the stores had a detailed cost breakdown, knew what each step was worth, and had a reference point when renegotiating wholesale prices. That is exactly the point of tiered direct sourcing: not to force cost to the floor immediately, but to make the opaque part transparent first.
FAQ
Why are factories reluctant to sell directly to small stores?
It is not reluctance so much as arithmetic: a single store's order volume often falls below the factory's minimum order quantity and minimum shipping unit, and the communication, customs and payment collection costs are uneconomic on small orders. When the volume approaches the threshold and someone handles the process on the buyer's behalf, the factory's attitude to small orders changes markedly.
Is direct sourcing always cheaper than wholesale?
No. Once inspection, tied-up capital, compliance responsibility and inventory risk are all counted in, the total cost of direct sourcing is actually higher for some categories. The test is whether the annual volume for that category can support the fixed investment, not the gap on the quotation alone.
Clarify the requirement first, then discuss price
Every layer of the chain rests on the same clear requirement: category, specification, material, target price, annual volume, certification requirements, packaging format and required arrival date. When the requirement is vague, quotations are not comparable and any chain analysis has no starting point. ESTROUTE has condensed this into a single-page Cross-Border Sourcing Brief used to align with clients on the first inquiry, so that two or three weeks are not consumed by repeated confirmation.
Back to news list